Keltner Channels: an ATR envelope around an exponential average
How Keltner Channels differ from Bollinger Bands, why the ATR width behaves differently from standard deviation, and when each is the right tool.
Keltner Channels is free on Basis — the button opens a live crypto chart with it already applied. No account, no trial and no limit on how many indicators you add.
Open the chartWhat it measures
Keltner Channels place an envelope around an exponential moving average, with the width set by ATR rather than by standard deviation.
The distinction from Bollinger Bands matters: ATR measures typical bar range including gaps, while standard deviation measures dispersion of closes. They respond differently to the same market.
In practice Keltner Channels are the steadier of the two. A session that whipsaws violently but closes near where it opened barely moves a standard deviation and expands ATR considerably, so the Keltner envelope widens while the Bollinger one does not — which is the behaviour you want when the channels are being used to size a stop rather than to spot an extreme.
How it is calculated
These are the steps Basis performs, verified against the published definition.
- 1
Compute an exponential moving average of the close over the period. That is the basis.
- 2
Compute ATR over the same period.
- 3
Place the bands at basis ± multiplier × ATR.
Settings
| Setting | Default | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 20 | 1 – 500 |
| Multiplier | 2 | 0.1 – 10 |
Twenty periods with a multiplier of 2 is common; the squeeze convention uses 1.5. A lower multiplier makes the channels tighter and the squeeze condition rarer, which is usually the right direction to move if the setup is firing too often to be worth watching. Because the width is ATR-based, the same multiplier means the same number of typical bars on every instrument, so settings transfer between markets far better than Bollinger multipliers do.
How to read it
- Because ATR includes gaps and intrabar range, Keltner Channels widen on violent single bars that leave Bollinger Bands relatively unmoved.
- Price riding the upper channel is a trend reading; the channels are smoother than Bollinger Bands and produce fewer touches.
- The comparison between the two is itself a signal — Bollinger Bands contracting inside Keltner Channels is the squeeze setup.
- The exponential basis reacts faster than the simple average Bollinger Bands use, so the whole envelope tracks a trend more closely and gives back less at a turn.
Where it misleads
The basis is an exponential average and the width is ATR, and both use the same period by default — but they need not, and platforms differ on whether the settings box exposes one period or two. A Keltner Channel with a twenty-period basis and a ten-period ATR is a legitimate and quite different indicator, so settings copied between platforms can produce visibly different envelopes.
Plot Keltner Channels on a live chart
Basis is free. Every indicator, every chart type, order flow, derivatives, screening and backtesting — no paid tier and no account needed to open a chart.
Open a chart with KCRelated indicators
Updated 2026-08-22 · Educational reference, not financial advice.